READ Free Dumps For Cisco- 300-135
Question ID 13450 | Scenario: Examine the configuration on R4. The routing table shows no entries for 172.16.10.0/24 |
Option A | HSRP issue between R4 and R2 |
Option B | This is an OSPF issue between R4 and R2 |
Option C | This is a DHCP issue between R4 and R2 |
Option D | The distribute-list configured on R4 is blocking route entries |
Option E | The ACL configured on R4 is blocking inbound traffic on the interface connected to R2 |
Option F | Answer : D Explanation: If we look at the configuration on R4 we see that there is a distribute list applied to OSPF, which blocks the 172.16.20.0/24 and 172.16.10.0/24 networks. |
Correct Answer | D |
Question ID 13451 | Scenario: The OSPF neighbour relationship has been lost between R1 and R3. What is causing this |
Option A | The serial interface in R1 should be taken out of the shutdown state. |
Option B | A neighbor statement needs to be configured in R1 and R3 pointing at each other. |
Option C | The R1 network type should be changed to point-to-multipoint non-broadcast. |
Option D | The hello, dead and wait timers on R1 need to be reconfigured to match the values on R3. |
Option F | Answer : C Explanation: In order for two OSPF routers to become neighbors, they must have matching network types across the links. In this case, we see that R1 has been configured as non-broadcast and R3 is using point to point non-broadcast. |
Correct Answer | C |