AllExam Dumps

DUMPS, FREE DUMPS, VCP5 DUMPS| VMWARE DUMPS, VCP DUMPS, VCP4 DUMPS, VCAP DUMPS, VCDX DUMPS, CISCO DUMPS, CCNA, CCNA DUMPS, CCNP DUMPS, CCIE DUMPS, ITIL, EXIN DUMPS,


READ Free Dumps For Cisco- 300-135





Question ID 13444

A customer network engineer has made configuration changes that have resulted in some
loss of connectivity. You have been called in to evaluate a switch network and suggest
resolutions to the problems.

You have configured PVST+ load balancing between SW1 and the New_Switch in such a
way that both the links E2/2 and E2/3 are utilized for traffic flow, which component of the
configuration is preventing PVST+ load balancing between SW1 and SW2 links

Option A

Port priority configuration on SW1

Option B

Port priority configuration on the New_Switch

Option C

Path cost configuration on SW1

Option D

Path cost configuration on the New_Switch

Option F

Answer : D

Explanation: Here is the configuration found on the New_Switch:

Correct Answer D
Explanation


Question ID 13445

You have been brought in to troubleshoot an EIGRP network. A network engineer has
made configuration changes to the network rendering some locations unreachable. You are
to locate the problem and suggest solution to resolve the issue.

R5 has become partially isolated from the remainder of the network. R5 can reach devices
on directly connected networks but nothing else. What is causing the problem?

 

Option A

An outbound distribute list in R3

Option B

Inbound distribute lists in R5

Option C

An outbound distribute list in R6

Option D

 Incorrect EIGRP routing process ID in R5

Option F

Answer : B

Explanation: Here we see that distribute list 3 has been applied to EIGRP on router R%, but access-list 3 contains only deny statements so this will effectively block all routing advertisements from its two EIGRP neighbors, thus isolating R5 from the rest of the EIGRP network:

 

 

Correct Answer B
Explanation

Send email to admin@getfreedumps for new dumps request!!!