READ Free Dumps For Cisco- 300-135
Question ID 13464 | The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a proof-of-concept
that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241.
After several changes to the network addressing, routing scheme, DHCP services,
NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble
ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241
address.
Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the
following questions.
What is the solution to the fault condition?
|
Option A | Under the BGP process, enter the bgp redistribute-internal command.
|
Option B | Under the BGP process, enter the bgp redistribute-internal command.
|
Option C | Deleted the current BGP process and reenter all of the command using 65002 as the AS number.
|
Option D | Under the BGP process, delete the neighbor 209.56.200.226 remote-as 65002 command and enter the neighbor 209.65.200.226 remote-as 65002 command.
|
Correct Answer | D |
Explanation Explanation: On R1 under router BGP change neighbor 209.56.200.226 remote-as 65002 statement to neighbor 209.65.200.226 remote-as 65002
Question ID 13465 | The implementations group has been using the test bed to do a proof-of-concept
that requires both Client 1 and Client 2 to access the WEB Server at 209.65.200.241.
After several changes to the network addressing, routing schemes, DHCP services,
NTP services, layer 2 connectivity, FHRP services, and device security, a trouble
ticket has been opened indicating that Client 1 cannot ping the 209.65.200.241
address.
Use the supported commands to isolated the cause of this fault and answer the
following questions.
On which device is the fault condition located?
|
Option A | R1
|
Option B | R2
|
Option C | R3
|
Option D | R4
|
Option E | DSW1
|
Option F | DSW2
|
Correct Answer | A |
Explanation Explanation: The BGP neighbor statement is wrong on R1.