READ Free Dumps For Riverbed- 201-01
| Question ID 8397 | From the perspective of reporting from the Cascade Profiler, what are the differences between flow reported by a Cascade Sensor (minimum version 9.0) and a Cascade Shark (minimum version 3)? |
| Option A | Flows reported by Cascade Shark will not include an application tag triggered by matching known signatures within the first 1000 bytes of the flow. |
| Option B | The Cascade Shark can forward flow to only one destination Cascade Profiler. |
| Option C | The communication between the Cascade Shark and Cascade Profiler is NOT encrypted as it is with Cascade Sensor and Cascade Profiler communication. |
| Option D | All of the Above. |
| Correct Answer | A |
| Question ID 8398 | What benefit does Cascade Profiler provide when obtaining SNMP information from an Access Tier switch? |
| Option A | By combining the switch port table of an access tier switch with utilization characteristics of router interfaces obtained via flow, Cascade is able to identify where hosts are plugged into the infrastructure. |
| Option B | By combining the switch port table of an access tier switch with the ARP table of a router with data obtained via flow, Cascade is able to identify where hosts are http://www.gratisexam.com/ plugged into the infrastructure. |
| Option C | Cascade is able to run a Vulnerability Scan across the switch. |
| Option D | Cascade is able to get SNMP statistics for port level problems from the switch. |
| Correct Answer | B |